Block #823129, the first block found by nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk nostr:npub1wnlu28xrq9gv77dkevck6ws4euej4v568rlvn66gf2c428tdrptqq3n3wr nostr:npub17swrr0ll933wv4djnzfkeg2g9qxp59237pzf67mvkfj4qr265skqxpumsd nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m after they upgraded to Knots v25.1 which fixed the datacarrier size bug and filtered all but one inscription 🤌🏽

Hand painted by nostr:npub1mfndvgwstwm604jvrt07p6nyy898mdsdzzyumx9sdn8u6r4za4uqck6f8v

Laser cut by nostr:npub12z5nym0qkxhdrvmyhup2llzp98lryr38gw8ywxktkps9eqdts7asjj9k9c

LONG LIVE THE REMNANT

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It is not censorship, arbitrary data has always been filtered in bitcoin. The scammers can go scam on L2’s. KEEP THE BITCOIN BASE LAYER FOR MONETARY TRANSACTIONS ONLY:)

It's choosing to mine a less profitable block. So leaving money on the table for miners. The reason? Censorship. At least that's how I see it.

nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze is actually more profitable for miners and hashers than other pools from what I understand. And that money on the table is negligible when the risk is an outright attack on bitcoin that could be catastrophic in the long run if the bug is not fixed. Besides the multiple reasons people should not be scamming and grifting on bitcoin, the difference is between a high and low time preference on the miners part regarding the extra fees from the shitcoins. Do you want bitcoin to become like Etherium?

he has the mentality of an ethereum degen

Personal attacks. Classy, and highly relevant to the substance of the argument!

You could apply the same rationale you use here to censoring transactions of blacklisted addresses and your argument holds.

You could, but you'd be an idiot if you did.

it isn't less profitable when there is such a large number of transactions to choose from

usually in any given block when traffic is heavy a lot that ends up deferred by some block templating algorithms are as profitable as the ones that get in

ocean is just leaving out the ones that have equal value but are spammy

you'd understand that if you knew how transactions are selected to add to blocks out of the mempool

and your attitude is complacent and you are encouraging surrender... such a winner

It is provably less profitable to filter high fee transactions with large amounts of witness data.

why not just et the degens flood the blocks and keep the mempool overflowing instead then, great idea