Nostr Web Client

The “Women’s Rights” Movement Was Never About Empowerment

They told you the women’s rights movement was about equality. But what if I told you it was about something else entirely?

🔹 Before the movement, most women raised their children, managed households, and passed down values.

🔹 After? Two incomes became the norm, families became weaker, and kids were raised by the system. Grooming them to their values.

And the biggest winner? The government.

💰 When only men worked, the government could only tax half the population.

💰 Get women into the workforce? Ay, now we get to double the tax base!

💰 Remove mothers from the home? Easier to shape the next generation.

This wasn’t accidental. It was a power move to increase state control and economic dependence.

Varangos ☦ 9mo ago

The "women's rights" movement was a veiled effort to erode what it means to be a women, and this obscure healthy femininity. As it progressed towards androgyny, it also effectively eroded what it means to be a man, and thus obscured healthy masculinity.

Some decent heuristics out of this:

* Anyone who tells you that the way that you were born is wrong is seeking to warp your mind so that they can manipulate/control you.

* If you are sick and they aren't encouraging you toward independent health (not reliant on centralized medicine), they want to use your sickly state to manipulate/control you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Born To Be Free 9mo ago

Exactly. The movement didn’t just target women, it was a full-scale attack on the natural order. By blurring the lines between men and women, they stripped both of their unique strengths, making people easier to control.

Once men were weakened and women were pulled away from the home, the family unit became fragile. And when the family breaks down, who steps in? The state.

You’re are spot on.

Independence—whether it’s health, family, or values, has always been the biggest threat to their power.