Can someone explain this better to me than the people I've seen interviewed? Bears are more dangerous I would rather take my chances fighting a human than a bear

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah. That would be way stupid to fight a bear, even a little black bear, its best to stay out of their way, let alone a Grizz.

Could you imagine a Kodiak or polar bear. Aren't kola's mean as shit at times too? So really it's a panda or red panda as only options?

Correction a Grizzly is a sub-speices of a Costal Brown Bear.

Ahhh nice thanks

They believe a bear will typically behave just like the bear in the last Disney movie they watched.

They believe a man will typically behave like the slasher in the last "true crime" drama they watched.

FemCels like that are defective thinkers who cannot distinguish fiction from fact and would make poor mothers. It is a good thing that they typically check themselves out of the genepool.

Thank you for that. Ending savage lol I like it

What got out of it. In either option most women would lose the fight since women tend to be physically weaker than both men and bears. So, I doubt they're comparing the possibility of fighting them. I think women fear violence directed at them by men more than an animal. Probably because they have more examples of that than bear attacks.

Okay but what do you think you have better chances fighting bear or man? Statistically higher prob of fighting a man, statistically higher probability of beating a man. This is why it doesn't make sense to me. How much violence is directed at an individual woman daily? I have no clue and it's why I'm asking