if "tail emission" means changing the total supply forever then i'm against it but i thought it just meant smoothing the emission curve so that every block can have a slight reduction or more reduction depending on where it is relative to genesis.
it's not about abundance and clean energy, it's about how whoever prints the money has an unfair advantage against those who use it, and destroys the potential for saving and the austrian model of credit (which is far more limited and doesn't have any bearing on issuance).
without saving, the people who print money dictate the things that get developed and that is a minority and that amounts to a ruling class.
Most of the bitcoin has already been mined now. True scarcity without the cantillionaires is coming. It is going to be epic to behold.
yeah, it changes the equation because those who were patient and saved have a different mindset than the spoiled brats born into privilege and instant gratuitous gratification. they invest in things that have long term benefits for everyone, increasing the common wealth faster.
precisely what communism promises but literally causes the opposite effect (because they abolish money altogether) - and they do it because they know that it makes them kings and pushes everyone down into serfdom.
Yeah, also You can only spend bitcoin once, so once it is spent, it's spent. Those wanting to borrow against it will learn this at some point they being scammed.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed