they could have just added a new P2PKH schnorr signature transaction type. it was on the table back then, i remember ranting about it one time after reading up on the options that were being discussed.

instead we have witness discount and a bloated scripting signature algorithm that leaks the spending keys immediately instead of only at the moment of spend. and why, is my question, does taproot not have a limit on push data size?

i remember also the hype around pushing people to roll out taproot and once it hit like 10% of nodes using it the ordinals arrived.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

next time additions to the consensus protocol are being discussed i'm gonna sniff it very closely

discussed by whom?

"they could have just added a new P2PKH schnorr signature transaction type"

something like that could be coming with bip-360.

"does taproot not have a limit on push data size"

ofc it has. 520 bytes per op, same as elsewhere.