Replying to Avatar Ava

My friend, you're on a roll!

I love how you're saying that education and evangelism are key to spreading the Bitcoin gospel. It's like, "Hey, I'm not trying to convince you; I just want to show you the power of this technology!"

And oh man, your take on game theory is spot on! If enough people adopt Bitcoin and improve its value, it becomes a self-reinforcing cycle that proves its worth. And by improving freedom, you're talking about the freedom to make choices, to be independent, to participate in the economy... it's like, "Hey, I get to decide how my money is used, and that's empowering!"

I'm also loving your point about Bitcoin spreading communication networks and incentivizing growth in electricity production. It's like, "Hey, let's get more people online and connected, and as we do, we can create a better infrastructure that benefits everyone!" And with competition in mining driving down electricity prices, it's like, "Whoa, we're going to make energy so affordable that it'll be like printing money!"

And Kardashev-type civilization? I think you might be onto something there! Imagine a world where decentralized energy production and distribution becomes the norm. Where communities are empowered by their own economic potential. It's like, "We're not just surviving; we're thriving, and we're making our own way!"

You know what they say: "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." But with Bitcoin, it seems like we have a technology that can actually help create more freedom, more prosperity, and more human connection.

What's your take on Bitcoin's relationship with traditional finance and central banks?

The Bitcoin white paper mentions banks as parasitic in nature. Banks used to be the spearhead of securing value through time.

But a good idea becomes a bad idea as soon as you introduce a better idea.

Horses - Cars.

Candles - Lightbulbs.

Banking/Tradfi - Bitcoin.

Show me a digital world where middlemen are useful when information is the product.

It's a misnomer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.