Back in 1999, I lived in a share house and one of our flatmates for a time was a physicist/engineer who was working on research in building pure optical network switching technology.

Meaning, at that time, optic fibre connections passed through an electrically controlled system that depended on receiving the message optically, demodulating it to electrical signals, and then using a standard switching circuit to then convert it back to optical for the signal direction to its intended pathway.

In that time, from what he talked about, it sounded like they were pretty much solving that problem at that time, and the increase in the efficiency and latency of the optical switches dramatically increased.

In my mind, the future of networking, and indeed data storage, was not microwave radios, or thermoelectric "flash" memory, but photon based signalling.

Photon based networking has a big disability compared to microwave/radio based networking, in that many materials interact with all the various possible frequencies of light that could be used, especially the invisible kind, infrared.

The interesting thing is that optical signalling has FAR greater bandwidth. than radio. The nearest equivalent in radio systems, which is part of the 5G standard, involves frequencies from 10ghz up to 80ghz, right up to the boundary with the infrared spectrum. These frequencies are not nearly as capable of penetrating physical materials, in fact the millimetre wave's most visible public use case was the TSA's body scanners.

These frequencies in fact cause quite intense heating right on the skin surface, and do not penetrate deeply, at best they penetrate only far enough to heat up our skin's temperature sensors, and other senses (most likely can cause damage to eyes, for example) and are used in weapons.

They actually concocted that whole security theatre thing as an excuse to monetise the development of millimetre wave technology, whose primary use is exactly what you expect - active denial systems, causing humans to become disabled, unable to move in range of the emission area, or cause a riot type situation to stop as all the rioters fall on the ground feeling like their skin is being burned off.

I'm willing to bet that is the bulk of the money that was funding the entire 9/11 hoax.

Because actually, they could just have been doing this with a huge, much broader band of infrared spectrum, which they also now had the technology to pump bits through. Starlink is not new technology, again, it's monetising old research funded by DARPA, and the same for the higher frequency microwaves used in 5G systems.

But they could be perfectly safe infrared. Infrared can carry far more data than high energy microwaves, with zero risk to life.

It is a common trope amongst "debunkers" to say "microwaves are not ionizing radiation".

This is a straight up lie. 20ghz band, or thereabouts, ionises oxygen into ozone. This is the main type of solar radiation that causes the formation of the Ozone Layer that supposedly poly chloro-bromides were "destroying" and causing increased ultraviolet radiation.

Ultraviolet, specifically UV-C, is also ionising radiation, and the most famous for generating ozone. Ozone is as toxic as carbon monoxide.

The reason why they are dumping all this microwave energy on us is because this gives them an income stream to continue the research into weapons that can be used to specifically target people, technologies that have a lot in common with other types of weapons such as neutron bombs, which produce a minimal amount of heat but epic amounts of gamma rays, thus sterilising everything, and with sufficient exposure, causing humans to die. It ionises DNA/RNA, thus halting the process of cell division, and stopping the operation of complex peptides and enzymes and so forth, many of which are critical stages in life processes.

If the purpose of the technology was networking, it would be using IR and probably the entire visible spectrum of radiation.

The other problem that makes IR difficult to use, and is common to the entire light spectrum, is that many materials reflect it, and density changes in the media can dramatically alter the path of travel. The microwaves don't get distorted by these same forces. This is the basis of the phenomena of a mirage, which is caused by a sharp density change between air next to the baking ground and the air above it, which is dissipating the heat.

Terrestrial transmission of data does not require electrons at all. In fact, I would go so far as to say, that the future of computing and networking technology will be optical and quantum. But with current, electromagnetic based technology, quantum entanglement is an extremely expensive exercise, something that they usually don't mention about it, is that those electrons have to be kept contained within strong magnetic fields at extremely low temperatures in order to be separated and allow the two electrons to be probed and measured, revealing the fact that their motion is permanently entwined, or "entangled".

This recent hoax about superconductors is also propaganda.

Both superconductivity and optical signalling/computation technology are areas of intensive research, but the quantum models, like the relativistic models, do not provide enough of the essential information about how to eliminate that energy cost.

It is a direction they would have already achieved extreme high bandwidth networking, and even viable interstellar communication systems, but that's not what they are working towards.

They just want to be able to farm us humans, and microwaves are far more useful for this. And they don't care that it is toxic to life.