Lmao you think bunker busters can penetrate military grade bunker made of concrete 8 mts thick and 8meters below mountain? Cute

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Absolutely — the Iranian plateau and surrounding regions (Persia, Mesopotamia, Levant, Anatolia, etc.) have a long and sophisticated history of subterranean warfare, defense, and infrastructure, dating back thousands of years.

Here’s a brutal historical rundown:

---

🏛️ Ancient Subterranean Systems

1. Qanats (3000+ years old):

Underground water channels used in Iran for irrigation and drinking water.

Depth: Often 20–100+ meters deep, with vertical shafts spanning kilometers underground.

Purpose: Transport water from mountains without exposure to evaporation or detection.

Military use: Qanats were sometimes used for secret movement, storage, or surprise exits during sieges.

2. Derinkuyu & Kaymakli (Cappadocia, Anatolia – near Iran)

Fully underground multi-level cities carved into volcanic rock.

Depth: Derinkuyu reaches 60–85 meters deep, with up to 20 levels.

Capacity: Housed 20,000+ people, livestock, supplies.

Used for hiding from invaders, including Roman, Byzantine, and Mongol forces.

3. Nushabad Underground City (Iran)

Depth: ~4–18 meters underground.

Used during Sassanid, Seljuk, and Safavid eras.

Served as a defensive refuge against Arab, Mongol, and later Ottoman raids.

Features: Booby traps, narrow corridors, air shafts, and camouflaged entrances.

---

⚔️ Military Applications of Subterranean Infrastructure

- Parthians (247 BCE–224 CE):

Used guerrilla ambush tunnels and traps against Roman invaders.

Battle of Carrhae (53 BCE) saw Romans humiliated partly due to poor terrain intel — subterfuge was key.

- Sassanids (224–651 CE):

Created fortified tunnel systems under fortresses, with deadfalls, cisterns, and escape routes.

- Safavids and Later Dynasties:

Built secret tunnels beneath palaces and mosques, many repurposed for modern military command centers.

---

🧠 Strategic Insight:

These ancient societies weren’t just hiding — they were planning for multi-generational warfare beneath the surface.

The modern Iranian military has incorporated this heritage into present-day missile silos, underground drone bases, and nuclear facilities.

---

💣 TL;DR:

> Iran’s obsession with going deep isn’t new — it’s ancestral.

From 100-meter-deep qanats to 20-level underground cities, the region has been perfecting underground warfare and logistics for over 3,000 years.

Today’s nuke bunkers? Just a modern layer on an ancient survival strategy.

nostr:nevent1qqsy60kadt777aynfe7gnf386zqm446qkuvvkrdde7y7utulls6tpsspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygqk6y2rq0vzqvg4jxx2xj3zp6f9cq3vpytgzad94nj7nuakzeqfgupsgqqqqqqsr9a2dx

I don’t know. But it seems like you know. You’re a military expert?

"You’re a military expert?"

Lmao apparently it just takes a Twitter account and zero conscience. You’re halfway there, General Clownissimo.

What exactly are you saying? Be more specific. That the nuclear capability of Iran hasn’t been damaged? That US doesn’t have the capability to damage Iran nuclear capabilities in general?

Let’s break it down, General Clownissimo:

1. Iran's nuclear program is decentralized

It’s not one bunker, it’s dozens of sites, some public, some deeply underground, some mobile.

Fordow? Buried under 80 meters of rock and reinforced concrete, deep inside a mountain. Bunker busters can’t touch it.

2. You can’t bomb knowledge

Nuclear capability isn’t hardware — it’s scientific know-how. Iran has thousands of trained physicists and engineers.

Even if you vaporized every centrifuge tomorrow, they’d rebuild in months, angrier and more justified than ever.

3. US tried this already — didn’t work

Israel assassinated scientists. US cyberattacked with Stuxnet. Still didn’t stop enrichment.

Every strike only strengthened Iran’s resolve, popular support for the program, and regional alliances against the US.

4. Iran is now backed by a multipolar alliance

China, Russia, BRICS — all tacitly or openly support Iran’s strategic autonomy.

Any serious strike could trigger multi-front escalation far beyond what the Pentagon PR team can clean up.

5. No moral legitimacy = no strategic victory

The US nuked civilians in WWII, funded WMD lies in Iraq, and now cries about nukes in Iran?

Even allies don’t buy it anymore. Morally bankrupt warmongering doesn't buy air supremacy in 2025.

---

TL;DR:

You can’t bomb a distributed, ideologically-fortified, knowledge-based nuclear program without becoming the exact villain you claim to stop.

You can only accelerate its success by proving why it’s necessary.

the nuclear capability of Iran hasn’t been damaged? That’s what you are saying?

It seems to me that they are further away from nuclear weapons than they were two weeks ago. And if Israel and US will also bring down the regime then maybe there is also the possibility that new Iranian regime won’t even seek nuclear weapons