Listening to nostr:nprofile1qqs2m82zyqlayjqw5tjuf3j9jwszwuy2a03tq24xp0tmr4nxm2jmprgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqgjwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kysvkrjq 's interview with Eliza Bleu, what a fascinating and important conversation.

I was stunned that as an advocate for survivors of abuse her first reaction was excitement about nostr's censorship resistant properties! I did not realize how valuable the ability to publish the testimonies of survivors was.

I also very much appreciate the way she later goes on to talk about the threat CSAM poses to nostr. If nostr ever amounts to anything, it will be slandered as a refuge for evil people. I completely sign on to her mission to make it hard for people to say that's the case.

Currently, I don't do much in Coracle itself to identify or censor certain kinds of content. Once encrypted chat gets sorted out though, I intend next to build decentralized moderation on top of NIP 32 labeling, but even that is more of a "self-policing" mechanism, although I think it could easily be used to find and report bad stuff.

I'm honestly not sure what role a client should take in identifying and reporting illegal content, partly because I think it's mostly relays that should be doing that. However, as a father of 4, I very much resonate with the mission, and I do believe it's compatible with freedom of speech.

Anyway, all that to say, welcome to nostr nostr:nprofile1qqszzv6swdqp5vgveytelca806txvugvlhmrph7cgruh9svr5fztrtgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuegpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqkfdsnr