Replying to Avatar jimbocoin šŸƒ

ā€œBigotā€ is one of my favorite words that has completely changed definitions in recent years. It used to mean someone who was intolerant of others’ beliefs (like an antisemite) as opposed to characteristics (like a misogynist).

By the old definition, an anti-racist would be a bigot because they were intolerant of racists’ beliefs. But by the modern definition, it would be the racist who was a bigot and not the anti-racist.

Discrediting someone by calling them a bigot is so effective that the weaponization itself now has a name: ā€œbigoteeringā€.

Isn’t language fascinating?

Avatar
Celata 2y ago

As I see it for the most part the people you accuse others of being bigots are usually bigots themselves since they are intolerant of that person's beliefs and want to shut them down and discredit them as you say, rather than discuss with them and potentially change their mind based on the new evidence they discover.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.