Replying to Avatar Unhosted Marcellus

Because of backwards compatibility. AFAIK datacarrier is for OP_RETURNs only, this would change its behavior.

For instance I don't want to relay OP_FALSE OP_IF transactions but I'm fine relaying OP_RETURNs smaller than 80 bytes. From my PoV it'd suck to roll both filters under the same config option.
Avatar
Luke Dashjr 2y ago

It's called datacarrier, not OP_RETURN...

Why would you be okay with 80 bytes OR, but not 80 bytes OFOI? (Assume there's an option to weight them both at 4 WU/B)

I might have another option just because, mostly debating this as a "devil's advocate"

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Unhosted Marcellus 2y ago

Because OP_RETURN was specifically designed for that, and I (subjectively) feel that up to 80 bytes here and there that are included in the block and pay the full fee is reasonable.

Avatar
Luke Dashjr 2y ago

No, it wasn't designed for it

Avatar
Unhosted Marcellus 2y ago

What for, then? 🤔 I always thought that OP_RETURN was for arbitrary bytes.

Avatar
Léo 2y ago

Apparently it was to burn bitcoins but you’ll have to be crazy to do that. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN

Avatar
Unhosted Marcellus 2y ago

They exist, though! https://twitter.com/YoshishiSatoshi/status/1668345218821939200

Avatar
Léo 2y ago

OMG Thank you for your donation guys 🫡😂

Avatar
Luke Dashjr 2y ago

Smart contracts. It indicates the transaction spending is invalid.