There is a -- probably unfounded and definitely not based on experimentation -- commonsense saying that cats play with their pray before killing & eating them so that they taste better. I even heard logic that blood sugar goes up and thus they taste sweeter, but I think that's bullshit.

The reason I'm skeptic is that I see no evolutionary benefit from doing an action to change the taste of sg, rather, taste has evolved to improve the selection of what to eat, and derive evolutionary advantage from that. I doubt there is nutritional difference between a stressed out and normal version of the same prey.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, taste evolves and is malliable. And cats can't taste sweet.