np its interesting that there is always taboo language, i thought we had grown beyond it
Discussion
Never.
The main reason I don't like using it is because I've seen people of all ethnicities and races get physically assaulted for using that type of terminology. The violence that ensues always seemed unecessary, which is why I encourage people not to use it. I figured that if they had not used it to begin with then those instances wouldn't have occurred, at all. I feel as if that logic is sound.
it might be sound but what if our ancestry had submitted to every little threat of violence where would we be? that said provoking someone would be unwise if you dont have a plan
also i like many would rather not live with those so easily provoked
Imo, racism would most likely still exist. You're forcing them to succumb to terms that they don't want to agree to, through the use of violence. Of course, provoking someone without a plan would be unwise and irrational.
No one wants to live near people who are so easily provoked. Which is why national borders have become more of a problem and not a solution to anything. Its as Nikola Tesla said "It is by abolishing all the barriers which seperate nations and countries that civilization is best furthered." Nationalism is a form of hatred which almost always lead to some form of unecessary conflict. Whether this conflict is a foreign or domestic one.
I'm going to be frank about this, and keep I'm mind, that I don't mean what I'm about to say in a disrespectful manner: I find you rather ignorant, in general.
Now, let me ask you a question: what do you think the world would be like if national borders and religion didn't exist?
