NEW VIDEO 🔥 Deadly Secrets of The USA Food Industry
Why does American food contain so many chemicals and additives BANNED in most other countries? And could the US government be collaborating with corporations to keep it a secret?
ft. nostr:npub1aftmyhm62lrp6lwsha3yzyjy5kqdvuy7g23qg28a8q0cnmudv0ds0sdcke
written by: nostr:npub177ck5ehc844vx59jct9wgs24mpm239p5kx7mmw36wfaw3z03mswq6hs3ws
produced & edited by: nostr:npub1h882a66p0zj5n69s2u8nfzev4f97lzfnlcej84z78p6uqxge5tpqlupz20
if you enjoyed the video 📺, we enjoy the zaps ⚡
it costs a lot of sats to research + produce these and we don't have any sponsors on them yet!
let's get based 🤙
Well done!
Such an important message.
🧡
Next do the "diamonds" fraud.
Your work is excellent.
mises website has a great article on how the debeers monopoly is imposed by govts, just in case you hadnt read it
the fiat food pyramid in action
Yes, they most likely are collaborating with both government and big business doing this to the USA
#BTC #Zap⚡#Nostr #FreeJulianAssange 🔥🚀
Amazing!!!! Powerful message!
Next please shoot : FIAT ACADEMIA.
Show how Fiat indoctrination starts at school and goes way up to the top of Academia. This is a scary and fascinating world of methodical brainwashing that most of us went through...and millions are going through it everyday.
To get started.
Also this is an interesting episode.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKJ5wqKjous&t=4192
"how has the influx of women changed higher education?"
"women are dominating at the undergraduate leve|. There are more women in graduate school and now there are more women who are faculty... I think it is probably a primary contributer to a lot of the cultural shifts... because they prioritize the values of women.
if you look at the number of professors getting harrassed on social media for studying potentially controversial topics, those are skyrocketing.
There are changes in academic journals saying they would not publish and potentially retract science that has the potential to 'undermine the dignity' of human social groups... all these harm concerns and protecting vulnerable people that are starting to interfere with a process that at least at one point was about finding truth, 'if it hurts some people's feelings then so be it'.
all these DEI initiaves, all these things are the things that women would care about"
"Mostly people (academic) are against taking these moral concerns when publish something... (when asked) how certian should be that a certian finding could cause harm before it was supressed... and i think it was the most common response that we should never suppress scientific findings. (A less frequent response) 'there should be evidence that the only way to prevent the harm is to supress the finding.. but you get almost no one at the bottom where they decide 'it should seem like it causes harm"
"i think its that support academic freedom and publishing findings that are self censoring and those that are really concernef about the harms of studies and retracting papers are very willing to say what they think"
nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl would love your ideas on this
This is excellent work team. The world is that much better for this expose.
