Mises was one of the first to point out that socialism is not only a failed economic system, but also a manifestation of resentment. In Human Action, Mises argues that socialism is driven not by a genuine desire for justice, but by hatred of others’ success. In his analysis, he identifies what he calls the “resentment of the mediocre,” an attitude that seeks to destroy those who excel instead of lifting those who are below. Socialism, according to Mises, is a rebellion against the natural inequality of talent, effort, and merit; it is a doctrine that attempts to impose by force an equality that human reality denies.

Friedrich Hayek, in The Road to Serfdom, warned that socialism not only leads to political totalitarianism but also to the moral degeneration of the individual. For Hayek, collectivism eliminates personal responsibility and fosters servility, rewarding obedience and punishing autonomy. Central planning, by suppressing the spontaneity of social order, also suffocates the virtues that sustain civilization: effort, frugality, honesty. In this way, socialism not only impoverishes materially but also corrupts spiritually.

Murray Rothbard was even more forceful in denouncing the immoral nature of socialism. In his writings, especially in The Ethics of Liberty, Rothbard argues that socialism is the very negation of natural law. According to him, those who promote it do not seek justice but institutionalized plunder. Rothbard emphasizes that socialism is based on envy: the desire to appropriate the fruits of others’ labor, disguised as altruism and compassion. Instead of dignifying the poor, it turns them into an instrument to legitimize state violence against the productive.

Jesús Huerta de Soto, following the Misesian and Rothbardian tradition, has described socialism as a “spiritual disease of modernity.” In his lectures and writings, Huerta de Soto argues that socialism is born of hatred for individual freedom and a nihilistic attitude toward life. For him, behind the socialist ideal lies a destructive impulse, a will to power disguised as social justice. The socialist, in his analysis, does not want to help the poor: he wants to destroy the rich. Socialism is, therefore, an ideology of resentment, of rancor toward the natural order that emerges from the free exchange among free individuals.

🖋️: Escuela Austriaca de Economía

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak , in The Bitcoin Standard, expands this critique by arguing that socialism is inseparable from the system of fiat money. According to him, the abandonment of sound money empowers governments to finance socialist policies through inflation and debt, masking the real costs of collectivism. Fiat money, in his view, is the lifeblood of socialism: it enables endless redistribution, fuels envy by punishing savers and rewarding debtors, and corrodes the cultural foundations of civilization. For Ammous, true resistance to socialism is not only intellectual but monetary: only with hard money, such as gold in the past or Bitcoin today, can society preserve freedom, responsibility, and prosperity.

Both of them are 100%. Socialism is a mind virus of the weak, its politics of jealousy and hatred

i say socialism is the same disease described in the book of genesis, where caine gets jealous because the Lord didn't like his vegan burnt offering, but preferred Abel's tasty bbq burnt offering. and later in Genesis we see the same theme play out between jacob (later, israel) and esau. envy and pride.

I hadn't heard of Huerta de Soto before, sounds his work is worth reading.

Also, it saddens me to no end that the world's most common political philosophy is one based on hatred of those able to bring about positive change and the desire to attain absolute power for power's sake at the cost of everyone except the powerful.

nostr:npub1d3f4m9dgvkdjxn26pqzsxn6lpfn78sxwllxyt8mp76q0a9zyyjlswhr4xv , in The Big Print, delves into how the modern monetary system fuels socialist policies. According to Lepard, governments’ ability to issue unbacked money generates inflation, inequality, and market distortions. This monetary expansion benefits governments and financial assets while harming savers and the working class. Lepard argues that fiat money is the foundation of modern socialism: it enables forced redistribution, fosters dependency on the state, and weakens personal responsibility. His proposed solution is the restoration of sound money—such as gold or Bitcoin—to return economic power to individuals and curb the cycle of debt and state control.

I just did a post on The Big Print as well. I recommend you use the #bookstr

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqstzuvfwf0l2yqezjhadzul5zfdxlnf9m8nxn7aau2gwj9fjwchtmsfvnfhv

It seems to me interesting that at the same time that we have this rampantly spreading growth of states and socialism within them, we also have an unprecedented concentration of wealth in a very tiny population.

Thinking about it some more, I have one hypothesis.

Given the predatory nature of governments, those ultra-rich that exist today have achieved that in spite of states, and to accomplish that they have necessarily become extremely adept at hiding in the shadows.

This makes Epstein etc a natural outcome

I'd say, do a study on Australia's current government and prime minister. The following is a perfect description of their behaviour...🥹

nostr:nevent1qqsyu64kck34wxyf5tzmps0w9g5zl4kmqepu5afh660099yp9u5w7ngpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtkfwhp