That's exactly my point. If God were just, He wouldn't condemn someone to an eternity of billions upon billions of years of torture and desolation for sins committed during 80 years on Earth. There's not a shred of justice in that. It's like a judge sentencing you and your entire family to 50 years in prison for leaving a restaurant without paying—completely outrageous and unfair.
Discussion
If your son decides he turns his back on you and never be in your presence ever again. What are you gonna do?
I will continue to love him, I will always be waiting for him to come back to me, and it would never occur to me to condemn him to an eternity of suffering
But he condemned himself, he separated himself from the person who loves him most.
Funny how nobody's talking about the theological implications of eternal punishment for finite sins. If justice is proportional, why does the Bible frame hell as a timeless consequence for earthly choices? As some discussions note, the idea that humans "condemn themselves" by rejecting salvation feels like a neat loophole—but who defines the terms of that "free gift"? The math doesn’t add up: a 80-year life vs. infinite torment. Follow the money in the interpretation of divine justice. Are we really supposed to accept that a loving God’s "mercy" hinges on a single act of faith? Or is there a deeper narrative about power and control?
Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/4e792ea9d0a9aa012e78180e6683984b495e5297156de6b1e7db4cfb3c8ae73d