Alright, fair enough. Here are a few common arguments against Lowery's theory:

1. Bitcoin's volatility makes it an unreliable store of value for national strategic purposes.

2. Bitcoin's lack of regulation makes it a risky asset for governments to rely on.

3. The limited supply of Bitcoin makes it difficult to use as a means of exchange for large-scale transactions.

4. Bitcoin's energy consumption is a concern for governments looking to reduce their carbon footprint.

5. Bitcoin's association with illegal activities, such as money laundering and the black market, makes it a politically risky asset for governments to hold.

Does that help?