You’re right, I meant false equivalence.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's not even an equivalence. Zaps are literally social credit.

Also if you're going to call something a false equivalence *highlight the differences that make the equivalence false* instead of just typing the name of a fallacy like you're playing a yu gi oh card.

Then everything compensation is social credit related. Silly argument.

It’s social credit because only people who suck up like a politician get rewarded with zaps. You aren’t providing value in exchange for currency. It’s exactly like social credit.

Nonsense. There are thousands of people on Twitter providing useful information, receiving hundreds of thousands of likes, and they’re not being compensated for that.