That is not what I am saying. I am saying that authoritarian policy doesn't mean it's a socialist policy. All colors of authoritarian benefit from soft money.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

People always talk about this non-authoritarian socialism... care to share an example?

The question was will socialism exist on a Bitcoin standard. You answered yes.

If you're talking about utopian bottom-up socialism, ok then maybe. But that's also never existed at any meaningful scale.

Top-down socialism - aka authoritarian socialism - necessarily requires coercive private property theft by the state. Bitcoin makes that untenable.

Norway? Sweden?

Relies on theft. Relies on theft.

You say that. To a country with incredibly high metrics and happiness rankings...

Ok.

That wasn't the question lol. Bitcoin makes theft through inflation a non-option. I'm saying that these systems, regardless of how well or not they work, will not be able to inflate their currencies and will become much less tenable

And yes, I suppose that as an anarchist I so mean bottom up socialism.

In a Bitcoin standard that makes life fair, I expect plenty will want to chip in for things that benefit others over themselves.

It's incredible to me that so many people conflate philanthropy and socialism...