tarot in a second -

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

i see it. lmfao. 🚬

now we know.

📇⬇️ policy:

be careful.... i take full responsibility.

https://apnews.com/article/fires-san-diego-arson-94bd5b87153cdf86c9be60982cf6eee3

for good old jean-yves. ☕️

#enmarche

https://x.com/emmanuelmacron/status/830035220824985600?s=46

📇⬇️ policy:

using sonic weapons at scale against your citizens is a war crime. i do not like being microwaved because i am researching my family lore quietly, while also being stolen from, at the same time. interestingly, not a crime. make sure you keep your emp boats docked. havana syndrome boxes on 3 and 4; olympics boxes on 1, 2, 3, and 4.

🔮⬇️ tarot:

honest affection is rare these days - especially shared publicly. i think that is a mistake. i also think arbitrary impositions on those you do not understand basses on your prejudices is not "policy"; it's retribution for your own trauma. calling in warships because someone thought something you do not like is not only overreaction, but it is illogical, despotic, and completely unchecked cruelty against citizens. allowing civilians without clearance or comprehension to hack military systems, regardless of their veteran status or if they were cia, is uncalled for, and it is a degradation of official capacity. using those who are unafraid of public affection ruining their partnerships just like yours were ruined originally: you have become what you hated. congratulations. your dms are not private. also, the world of aid is becoming more clearly visible: the double standards surrounding finance is seeing daylight, and unfortunately, fake books are really problematic when the continued call for investment is howling at the door - and there is nothing. i disagree pretending there is value creates value; pretending while creating more value is not a terrible idea, but no one seems interested in doing that either. there is a great deal of private scheming and little displaying of public solidarity. i defend the ethical lines. i do not care if you dislike it. your delusion is not my reality.

ⴲ.

more later. chores. 🌱☀️

📇⬇️ policy:

veto.

human things. more later. ☀️

it's about 68 degrees, cloudy, and there's a thunderstorm rolling in over the mountains.

🤣😂🫡

🍲⬇️ food:

my daughter and i picked up sandwiches, and they gave me number 72, and i jokingly said "oh, nein, danke" and he said "huh"? and i said "nein - 7+2 is 9, nein is no in german" and he stared at me and i smiled and he continued to stare blankly at me and i said "nevermind, it's a joke" and he said "huh huh oh okay - that will be ready in about 10 minutes" and i said "great".

happy 3rd or whatever.

heh. 🫡

🌚⬇️ "the programmer":

(the_book_of_ruth™️/having_bled_to_death™️ snack)

blue is feminine, red is masculine.

if you cosplay jesus, regardless of your gender, you are probably experiencing dysphoria if you identify as a masculine.

jesus was a divine feminine spiritual self, even if his biology was male. mary magdalene was a masculine in a female body. they shared memory, so it blended.

in a catholic church, which bars women from ministry - and rejects rabbinical union (and the rabbinical union of jesus and mary) which balances divine selves - the genderized distortion erases simple truths because the scrambling against those facts becomes the only focus. if you imagine the artificial elevation of the mother and infallibility of the father in christianity does not cause social problems - you probably have forgotten to deepen your faith through inquiry.

nostr:nevent1qqsrlyrnhchrkr7sfdqycw88pn5styx80j0m0jux93dn6pyk6zzsnqqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqgjwaehxw309amk7apww468smewdahx2qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucn8qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv2z0cqj