I often encounter people who reject everything that the "mainstream" is telling them. They do this because humans are partly pattern machines. We see a pattern and extrapolate it. So if the "mainstream" lies over and over, it's tempting to just believe everything they say is a lie.

But the reason all you hear from mainstream are the lies and the evil is primarily that your input feed is curated to bias for such things. You are being focused onto things that are not representative. Making statistical inferences like "it's all lies" is actually a bad inference because it is only your feed that is all lies.

Sure, there is enough data to day that Biden is probably guilty of corruption. But you should also leave room for doubt. Maybe Ray Epps wasn't an FBI agent.

Case in point is global warming. IIn fact, that is my litmus test. People who say the whole thing is a scam to have an excuse for world government socialism... they have this thinking problem. They are the ones who cannot actually find truth because they are relying on simple statistical patterns that don't represent reality, rather than going and looking for themselves at actual evidence. They are also the most confident and comfortable in their ignorance, which makes total sense. If they weren't comfortable in their ignorance, they might have discovered the truth. This is probably the underlying cause of the Dunning-Krueger effect.

The world is complex. Simple answers are probably wrong. Epstein might have killed himself. Steel does soften and lose structural holding ability well below it's melting point. The UFO pictures are probably reflections or other artifacts. Most people are not malicious. But many people are highly deluded. And the global mean temperature is increasing primarily due to more CO2 being in the atmosphere than ever before.

Feel free to disagree but this is not a thread I want to have arguments in. This is just a thought I wanted to put out there. And agree or disagree, I'll keep working to make gossip the best nostr client I can make it.

global warming is not a good example... so many groups of scientists explaining it is fake, for decades...

decades of "the world is going to end in 10 years" just to move the goalposts again. First, it would freeze, then warm, then "change", now, "boil"

a few centuries ago the world was cooler. a few centuries back, warmer, then cooler, then warmer again. And not as in "the average was 0.5 deg more or less", but as in "crops that did grow do not grow anymore", "we used to walk over the frozen Thames", "we have to abandon Groenland, it was much 'Groen' before". CO2 as cause of global warming never was consensus, on the contrary...

the golden rule of the 21th century:

if the solution makes you a miserable slave, the problem is fake.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I have for decades collected evidence on both sides, and analyzed it continually. I have read many books, mostly books arguing against the catastrophizing like "apocalypse never", but also books on the other side like Bill Gates book, and also books down the middle like Gareth Morgan's Poles Apart. And the net result of all of that research is that you are wrong on this. And even that some people are maliciously misleading such as Tony Heller. Listen to court proceedings with Tony Heller and you'll see who the man really is.