That's a refreshing perspective given the preponderance of male commentary on anarchy discussion. Not that I'm speaking for the advocates of anarchy but from what I understand they might say that anarchy is not necessarily a chaos without order and governance but rather an order and governance that is not forced on a population by a state apparatus. The word anarchy is perhaps a loaded term as it is currently used and understood now. Rules and order, theoretically, would be a result of adherence to common values, an agreement by individuals to adhere to a "contract" of behaviour/rules. Maybe it's possible to say the Bitcoin protocol is anarchy as it's a system that is not imposed by state authorities but rather a system that we agree to maintain and interact with and by doing so we sustain the protocol.
........maybe. 🤔
Theory and the reality of humans though........