The web numbering just got irrational

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

it’s always been irrational so may as well make it official.

Disappointed I missed the boat on webe

its only natural to miss it

Raises an important question though: which is more imaginary, webi or web3?

Web3 is negativ without square

meh. it was pretty derivative imo.

Yes, everyone knows the correct numbering system goes…

1

2

3

3.1

95

98

XP

Vista

7

8

10

11

Whoops! I missed version 2000 which obvious is between version 98 and version XP.

And Me?

Windows 1 😂