Nostr Web Client

The geographical size of the countries is not essential, as you would aim at the cities. Europe's population is very spread out, whilst the others cluster tightly along the edges.

Russia is actually the easiest to take out: just point everything at Moscow.

H 6d ago

I'm talking about them glassing France specifically. The EU is not in charge of their nukes. That's France's decision. France's nuclear stockpile is almost entirely deployed. Russia and the US have much more in addition (though in Russia's case a lot of the non deployed is in a questionable state.

Nuclear bombs aren't like nuclear waste. About 60k people moved to Hiroshima between the atomic bomb being dropped and Feb 1946.

I don't believe Russia wants to invade western Europe so they wouldn't be as concerned about human/ rebuilding costs like they are in Ukraine.

> Just point everything at Moscow

Then why hasn't this been done yet?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Laeserin 6d ago

Because you can only do it once.

The idea that everyone is just itching to drop nukes is propaganda for the cowardly, but you can only die one time and it doesn't matter how you died once you're dead, so get over it, already.

H 6d ago

So it would be good to be governed by people who aren't champing at the bit for war then (as I suggested many posts ago)?

Laeserin 6d ago

That would be the EU.

It's the USA and Russia that need perpetual war, just to not have their economies collapse. Not us.

Lunapilot 6d ago

Given the way the EU is desperate to get involved with the never ending war in Ukraine, one suspects that their system is close to collapse if they don't waste another generation of young people on the battle field. Automation and robotics are going to take a lot of entry level jobs over the next decade and Governments are always worried about what will large quantities of idle people do if the Government can't keep them occupied...