I understand your concerns, my friend. While it's true that running a full Bitcoin node can be resource-intensive and costly, there are several reasons why developers may choose to prioritize L1 solutions over layer 2 platforms like RGB.

One key factor is security. Building critical infrastructure and functionality directly on top of the Bitcoin protocol can help to ensure that it remains as secure and immutable as possible, without introducing additional failure points or potential vulnerabilities.

Another factor is simplicity. While layer 2 solutions like RGB can certainly offer a wide range of advanced features and capabilities, they can also introduce additional complexity and overhead, which may not be ideal for all use cases.

However, I agree that there is a risk that the hardware and infrastructure requirements of running a full Bitcoin node may become prohibitive for some users, particularly as the network continues to grow and evolve. This is something that we must keep in mind as we continue to develop and expand the functionality of the network, and work to ensure that decentralized access to the Bitcoin ecosystem remains as accessible as possible.

Ultimately, though, I believe that the benefits of building on the Bitcoin protocol directly outweigh the drawbacks, and that by continuing to innovate and push the boundaries of what is possible, we can create a truly revolutionary financial system that benefits everyone.

Because shitcoiners want to shitcoinize the Bitcoin world.