No one is saying they are "work arounds"
They are saying, "If you publish a note on nostr it is not private"
Blasting a .json to relays is not private. Don't kid yourself.
Discussion
If you encrypt it, it is, it's a choice, that the protocol enables you to make.
Get your head out of your ass and stop humiliating yourself.
Or we can continue the discussion if you know what being respectful means and don't just rely on being passive aggressive just to get your points across.
Don't be smart with me.
If you encrypt a Kind 1 you know exactly how many people will see it.
You are being an antagonist and a smart ass. You have no clue how Nostr works.
Yeah how would I, been only developing on it for 3 years and have a nip merged, and multiple clients 😂 I have no clue what nostr is.
You obviously don't encrypt a kind 1, you make a new kind with encrypted notes, that's another client I'm working on, point is, nostr let's you do this. It's literally a blessing for online privacy, since you don't need to rely on a service for being private, you can verify it yourself.
And you don't know how to spell either.
This is as clear as it comes:
{
"id": "40ac5a87b02566434a90ab1daff9f481bdd6a8122d687011f1f3d22d1823f4d8",
"pubkey": "c21b1a6cdb247ccbd938dcb16b15a4fa382d00ffd7b12d5cbbad172a0cd4d170",
"created_at": 1751175147,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b57537884cd80dc0a75a7160ebc8cbd3f43116349a4a024e52ac2a60b7e71739",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"94f1782e440430f2d209f2c46f61fd5b38b9fe8798cc2ff840e9b863607fb1be",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"q",
"b57537884cd80dc0a75a7160ebc8cbd3f43116349a4a024e52ac2a60b7e71739"
]
],
"content": "Today I Learnt, I have no clue how nostr works 😂\n\nnostr:nevent1qqst2afh3pxdsrwq5ad8zc8ter9a8ap3zc6f5jszfef2c2nqkln3wwgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygy579uzu3qyxredyz0jc3hkrl2m8zulapuceshlss8fhp3kqla3hcpsgqqqqqqsee0fxl",
"sig": "2cf8a051467c702cb81e7879d647bd4c90551fb2c4d7834a9815633e6729145b4461d725e581b74c232d3394fbf81970329311a57c202f2b0e6bc4d7edcfc60f"
}
Furthest thing from private by default that you can imagine