"No one wants to censor your transaction, they just want to censor transaction if it's not a certain kind of transaction."

Do you understand the conundrum we have here?

Do whatever you want in your mempool. Don't make the same argument for consensus rules. There is no way to stop "non financial transactions" from being included in a block. I'd argue any consensus tx is a financial tx. They're paying a fee in a currency to a miner. That's financial. You're free to disagree and make your mempool reject whatever you want.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You aren't making any sense. There is no grey area, a transaction is a financial transaction or it's not.

Finance refers to monetary resources and to the study and discipline of money, currency, assets and liabilities.

Any transaction that involves money is financial by definition. there is no grey area. This is financial.

https://mempool.space/tx/376ef7eba8eebb013ec8d2cacc21c8e8ab7ab960645df459c292071aeb4b8fef

(I just picked a random one)

You can deflect that nonsense elsewhere buddy.

Explain how it's nonsense. Make a real argument. Again this is all arbitrary. That's my whole point and you refuse to acknowledge that because you don't like certain zeros and ones being passed around

I run Knots, there is nothing to discuss. Vitalik is waiting for you.

I'm not defecting. You are. I'm not a shitcoiner and I have no motivations to shitcoin on bitcoin. You can achieve the same results of knots with core. But you don't understand the technicals so you're just virtue signalling by running knots. I don't care what you run.

Do not attribute motive to me where I have none because you can't argue facts.

You failed to demonstrate how but 🫂

We are speaking a different language/cannot agree on first principles, so it makes no sense to continue. Luckily we don't need to agree as Bitcoin is decentralised and doesn't care.