Replying to Avatar hzrd149

Sorry to hear that, although maybe we will meet at nostriga?

The permissionless rebroadcasting is the point, that's how we get censorship resistance.

Blossom and NIP-96 are designed for public media, neither have the expectation that the media will be kept private.

I wouldn't be opposed to making my blossom-server implementation support NIP-96, however I don't think it would make sense to add it as a requirement to the protocol since supporting two event kinds would double the complexity

Avatar
brugeman 1y ago

Anyone can rebroadcast file permissionlessly by authing with their own keys. But ok, maybe delegating this to a server to save bandwidth is an added benefit. Will see how it develops

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.