Flash, every day, you expose your ignorance and I’m going to point it out to you with the hopes of making you better at what you do. You may not like it, but if you are going to represent yourself as a fountain of information, you need to be held to account. Perspective matters. Words matter. Case in point, you use the word “claims” to describe what Michelle Obama is “stating.” Do you understand the difference in neutrality between these two words?

Do you understand that when you say she “‘claims men can’t truly understand” you are implying that the claim should be viewed skeptically?

Perhaps you do understand. And you are intentionally using that word because you think what she’s saying should be refuted.

That’s not journalism. That’s you presenting your bias, as a man. The truth is, actually, that she is correct. A woman’s biology (including her reproductive system) does far more for her own body than simply reproduce. The fact that this appears to be a controversial statement *to anyone* only emphasizes how misunderstood a woman’s body is to men both in the medical community and lay people like yourself.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Are you mansplaining?

A common mark of an emotionally immature person is that they project themselves onto others. What’s remarkable is how this trait spans national and cultural identities (especially Western ones). A young man from Australia will exhibit low emotional intelligence in very similar ways to a Brit, for example.

Trolling is a great example of this. A low value attempt at attention seeking. Bye.

I like your tip on how to become as professional a journalist as possible... I believe that has solid merit and is helpful

But to be fair, that post just seems like man-hating gobbledy-gook... created to divide us further.

And the claim is made that giving birth is the least important aspect of a woman's reproductive system... which is laughable to me... this is an opinion and not a fact... and essentially the entire clip is an editorial opinion and not fact based.

Thanks for your comment. Just to set the table stakes for this discussion, how familiar are you with a woman’s biology? Say on a scale of 1-10. This is not a gotcha, I’m just trying to gauge how to talk with you. As an example, if you are a woman, you might answer 10. Although you may not if you have a low understanding of your own biological processes — many women do. Likewise, if you are a man and you are being honest, you’d probably need to answer less than 5 unless you have spent considerable time studying the subject and/or performed a survey of women with questions about their experiences, at various stages of their lives.

So, where are you at 1-10?

Got it. Not sure how much further I want to disuss this, but I'll play along. I know that a woman's vagina assists with both the fertilization process between the sperm and an egg, as well as delivering the baby when the time is right. That probably puts me one step above "me tarzan, you jane" on the scale, wherever that is.

With that said, I would never pretend to be an expert on women's reproductive systems. On the other hand I would say that I'm well versed in smelling bullshit. And the fact that the claim is made that the least of what a woman's reproductive system does is produce life is bullshit.

I’m not playing, and not asking you to either. This is a discussion. Don’t diminish it.

First, admitting how little you know is great and thanks for being honest.

Please don’t take offense, but you’re somewhere between 0 and 1, on scale of 1 -10. Seriously, take that with humor and humility. There’s nothing wrong with not knowing something. The error is thinking that you can “smell bullshit” accurately in a domain you admittedly know very little about. Second, whatever you think about Michelle Obama, which I can tell is very little, let’s agree the the clip is a small sound bite of a larger conversation. The clip was presented as such PRECISELY because it is being used to trigger a response from you. You know that, right? You had the immediate *sense* that something feels off and you are calling bullshit. But, you don’t know very much about the topic and, and this is important, you don’t know what else was said prior to, or after, this statement. There might have been additional context or information that could help you. There wasn’t, so I’m going to try to do that now.

What distinguishes a woman’s body from a man’s is more than just a vagina which is just the externally visible sex organ. Other parts of the reproductive system include the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries (just to name a few that you might have heard of). Importantly, the ovaries don’t just produce eggs for pregnancy. They produce hormones during menstruation. Say a woman gets pregnant once in her life, the fact that she menstruates EVERY MONTH (between puberty and menopause) should tell you something by the simple ratio of their occurrence. A woman’s body needs these hormones for her overall health (yes, everything from her brain to her bones to her physical stamina and energy levels). The ovaries are *far more* important to a woman’s general health than her vagina, even though both are part of her reproductive system. Understanding this, take a moment to watch the video again and you’ll see that what she’s saying is that you can’t you reduce a woman’s reproductive health to *just* giving birth, and that it is, in fact, “the least important thing about the reproductive system as a whole.”

To really hammer this home, consider that some women never give birth, and yet, their reproductive system is still vital to their general health and well-being on a daily basis. Nothing about what I’ve just written is controversial. That is, unless you don’t know how a woman’s body works. Her point is that lawmakers and politicians, especially religious ones, have about as good of an understanding about women’s health as you do… which is to say, very little. This is not meant to divide us, or insult men, or put women’s needs over anyone else’s.

It’s simply a fact that if you don’t know much about a subject, you should not hold strong opinions about it, and you definitely shouldn’t be legislating on it, or even advising others on what they should do with regards to the topic.

Does this make sense?

Thanks for the engagement. We can agree to disagree. Downplaying a woman's ability to create life doesn't play well with me.

We can certainly disagree. No harm in that. However, how are you interpreting what I said as “downplaying a woman’s ability to create life”?

This is really interesting, because the clip from Michelle Obama explicitly explains how the entire reproductive system is important to a woman’s own life, throughout her life, and not *just* her ability to create a life. She’s literally saying that even if all you want is for a woman to make babies, you should take care of her entire reproductive system and general health.

Anyway, you seem to be elevating one function of a woman’s reproductive system over others. And, you know, that’s sort of EXACTLY the critical point she’s making.

A bit of unsolicited advice: you may want to think more about “what a woman’s purpose is.” If you think it’s just to create life, then you are not treating any woman as an individual person, just a functionary. I don’t know how else to put this, but that’s really sad. I hope you don’t treat your mom, sister, girlfriend/wife, or daughter as if they exist simply to serve one specific reproductive function. That’s a really poor way of interacting with the world and 50% of the people in it.

But, yeah, you do you, I guess. The proof of whether your view is correct will be revealed over the course of your life in whether women find it’s worth their time to connect with you on a deep and meaningful level.