Replying to Avatar walker

No one is advocating for that…
Avatar
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) 3mo ago πŸ’¬ 1

You are deliberately being obtuse. Removing the limit will only open the floodgate. This will lead to MORE spam, porn, and shit, NOT less.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
walker 3mo ago πŸ’¬ 3

No, I’m not. You made a false statement. Correcting you is not β€œbeing obtuse.”

If you’re confused, read this:

https://stacker.news/items/978404

Avatar
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) 3mo ago

What false statement? You think removing the OP_Return will lead to more spam is false? Stop thinking economically only. Why open an attack vector for anyone who wants to kill Bitcoin? Remember, you CAN’T roll back the chain. It only takes 1 CSAM to open up a can of worms and fuck it up for everyone. FOR WHAT? So miners can make another dollar?

Avatar
α΄›Κœα΄‡ α΄…α΄‡α΄€α΄›Κœ ᴏꜰ α΄ΚŸα΄‡α΄‹α΄œ 3mo ago

how does changing a mempool filter fix the problem of datacarrier limit from taproot and segwit tho?

Avatar
Diacone Frost 3mo ago

nobody seem to care. both sides are focusing on wrong things.

Avatar
OceanSlim 3mo ago

How?