I tend to be on the other side, something about him I don’t trust but I’m glad he’s here. We make better decisions when both sides of an argument are presented.
Discussion
interesting.
im pretty good and smelling dishonesty. i dont detect any. he clearly believes everything he says, and argues from a morality position of wanting to preserve bitcoin longevity. that in and of itself has value. im curious to see who argues with more personal attacks. those are usually the people who are lying.
Absolute chad presentation from him:
nevent1qqsvrcdhmwf0djx4l3x89hjzj0ntt824vwfz4jthynsreuansqjhl7gpremhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtm5wf6hxar9vs6r0cs5
i do find it amusing that the core arguments seem to a conservative perspective vs a progressive perspective.