I get what you mean, but for recent counter-examples, see Bitcoin and MAGA.
I'll leave it to the reader to identify the difference between the harpies screeching in unison and bottom-up grassroots non-identitarian movements.
Discussion
MAGA is partially made up of white women, however I would say it is a movement that primarily consists of men since men, primarily white men have been abandoned by society.
Yeah, but not the blue-haired, victim-mentality, always-angry, xanax-loving, feminist, misandric, holier-than-thou, oh-so-virtuous supports the current thing variety of white woman (which, to be fair, seems to be most of them these days).
The current thing is (was? 😁) leftism, and women are much more compliant and pliable in general, going along with what seems acceptable rather than sticking their heads out and going against the tide. Many tyrants seem to have realized this over the centuries and it has certainly been my observation as well (in general).
It's easy to rally them with sad stories of oppression. And it worked, for awhile.. that seems to be changing now. Or rather, the status quo is changing, so soon enough voicing leftist opinions will be what constitutes going against the tide, and all but the most blue-haired of them will sing another tune.
Women as a whole generally are more agreeable than men are, that's why they tend to reflect the most socially acceptable opinions since it's a survival instinct.
Women don't have the physical strength like men on average to express socially unacceptable opinions, or behaviors.
Most women who do are usually married to a man who expresses opposing views himself as well, or have nuerologial disorders where they engage in behaviors that are socially unacceptable like Autism, or other types of nuerodivernce.
Everyone's been abandoned by society. Victim narratives and false service to nonwhites don't help them either.