True! I guess one more problem to solve. 🐶🐾🫡
Discussion
They have the same issue with shit coin Jpegs. Like the bored ape guys suing people for miss use. It’s a lawyers playground. Money for jam for that lot
You could have some sort of DRM but then that very much limits how it could be used.
DRM is doable, but not desirable. We will have to put some trus into people not doing bad shit. If it happened, then it’s ok. If it becomes systemic, then we will need to give it a hard look! 🐶🐾🫡
Can it be a set of items that have a digital encryption in the meta data. Making it unique? Or is that ordinals. So complicated. See what you have done fish
We don’t need that shit! We can have standard JPEG metadata and that’s all. Making it too complex is just going to make things wors! 🐶🐾😂
You can embed copyright info etc into a Jpeg but that can just be stripped out anyway. Or you can just screenshot.
I think there are probably uses cases for both. In the case I was talking about in the other thread for creators wanting to monetise content then DRM may be desirable so that only a user that had paid for the content can view it. In the case of a digital asset that has some sort of terms of service allowing use then DRM doesn’t work.
If you can view it you can snatch it. So no way around it. Can restrict url based on cookies for sure. Rehosting it breaks that protection! 🐶🐾🫡
Yeah I was thinking more for video content where it is harder to get a perfect copy if the stream was encrypted but you could obviously still do a screen record of it.