I was indeed speaking to his stance on protocol development.

If he wants to fund a new wallet, he can knock himself tf out.

He has no control over the protocol and anyone who thinks he does is simply fooling themselves.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

he gonna,make a DiD wallet or something? 🥱

What is DiD?

Signature aggregation is a mathematical technique whereby you can take the literal mathematical sum of two signatures and have the result be valid. In theory, all the block space wasted on signatures could be replaced with a single signature covering every transaction in the block. Bitcoin requires 0 changes to make this happen. It’s just that someone has to write the wallet software.

Agreed. And Saylor stating he doesn’t want to control the future of development by making people dependent on his fiat is not a bad thing to say.

I'm not really bitching about Saylor himself. I'm having an issue with people that think he somehow has a level of control on bitcoin development at the protocol level and there are quite a few.

It's almost turning into straight FUD and that's where I'm concentrating.

I hear ya. But I think we both agree that Saylor rejecting the “hi, I’m new to bitcoin and I’m here to change it and make it better” faux pas is a good thing.

Yes. Yes we do.