Replying to Avatar The Fishcake (nostr.build)

Something like that? 🐶🐾🤔

function hashPhoneNumber(phoneNumber):

hashedValue = ""

for each digit in phoneNumber:

if hashedValue is empty:

hashedValue = argon2Hash(digit)

else:

concatenated = hashedValue + digit

hashedValue = argon2Hash(concatenated)

return hashedValue
Avatar
jb55 1y ago 💬 1

I like this. It would be crazy hard to build a table for this, maybe by setting a large iteration security parameter? I would just have an initial salt value just in case this approach gets standardized, but otherwise I’m leaning toward this. I don’t think you would even need the name to simplify it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
The Fishcake (nostr.build) 1y ago 💬 2

I think so! And we hardest iteration number you’ll make it close to impossible to table for the next 5-10 years, which is sufficient for this level of information 🐶🐾🫡

Avatar
boston wine 1y ago

You all are so fucking smart it’s ridiculous

Avatar
Raymon 1y ago 💬 2

But as usual, we're solving problems from a technical perspective. 😞

Avatar
jb55 1y ago 💬 1

what do you propose to solve this problem?

Avatar
Raymon 1y ago

I propose not to stick with that old "phone number" stuff. Just don't do it, it's not necessary, we have nip05, I.e.

Avatar
Raymon 1y ago

Using phone numbers for nsecs is like using coinbase for #Bitcoin.