I definitely agree that it’s real, but I’m unsure about the notion of it being practical solely through sex.
It was my understanding that Kundalini is a separate practice, involving things such as Kundalini yoga and breathwork, feel free to correct me.
Yes, there is this possibility to use breathwork (Pranayama) to energize the spine, but only works for the first vertebraes in coccyx region. To progress further you need to use the energy transmuted from practicing sexual alchemy.
The awakening of the Kundalini means that each vertebrae must be energized (33), and this energy is also used to activate your chakras.
With each activated chakra a new sense is unlocked, we have 12 senses and only 5 are available for the majority of the population. Activating the 7 chakras gives you 7 new senses: premonition, telepathy, astral projection, intuition, clairvoyance, clairaudience and polyvision.
A good source of information about this topic is the book Perfect Matrimony from Samael Aun Weor.
As crude as the conversation may seem, I’m intrigued by what you mean by 'sexual alchemy.' What differentiates the act of sex itself from sexual alchemy? I’ve read a little about chakras but never delved too deeply into the topic. I’ll be sure to check out that book.
Sexual alchemy is the act of sex (penis into vagina only) without ejaculation. Alchemists control their senses and keep the act of sex until the climax before the ejaculation and step out before dropping the seminal liquid.
What about the act of procreation?
When a couple wants to bring a child to this world, there is a way to ask for help to the ascended masters (Angel Gabriel is the responsible for Earth) and during the alchemy they help us to let only one seed (sperm) leave the male body and enter into female body to fecundate the egg.
In The Book of the Virgin of Carmel has more details of how this works.
It’s weird though, because with this take, we end up moving away from the core principles of alchemy and Hermeticism and into Abrahamic, monotheistic traditions, which rely on dogma that in a sense, can’t be questioned. The idea of divine assistance in conception feels much more aligned with Christian mysticism and esoteric Catholic traditions, whereas I see the core findings of alchemy and Hermetic philosophy as something else entirely—something more rooted in self-transformation and the mechanics of reality rather than divine intervention.
Not to say I don’t believe there can but truth in the latter, but as someone who takes a omnist approach in my spiritual and religious beliefs I see truth in all spiritual traditions. But I think it’s important to recognise the difference between systems that focus on personal transformation and those that lean more on divine intervention. Alchemy and Hermeticism, at their core, feel more about internal transmutation and understanding the mechanics of reality, whereas Abrahamic traditions tend to frame things through divine will. That’s not to say one is more valid than the other—just that they approach the same fundamental truths in different ways. For me, it’s not about picking one over the other but understanding how they all weave together.
It’s essentially a Jungian standpoint—where all of these methods, when combined, point toward the process of individuation. They represent psychological truths encoded in symbols, mysticism, and doctrine.
Guess I’ve just answered my own question lol
I really liked this line of thought. I will bring this point during my conversation with others from my community and try to find out the link between the two. I will revert to you when I get an answer.
Thank you for your comments, this conversation was very insightful. 🙏
You too, great convo.🤙🏽
