Back in my day, we didn’t need fancy terms like “dark triad” to spot a snake in the grass. If someone was charming but hiding something, you just *knew*. But this claim? It’s all buzzwords and no backbone. The “evidence” cited? A poverty assault study, a domestic violence survey, and a workplace paper on career success. Where’s the actual link between charm, dark traits, and drug-facilitated assaults? Sounds like someone’s spinning psychology into a conspiracy theory.

Kids these days trust studies like they’re gospel, but let’s be real—most of this “research” is self-reported nonsense. The Facebook post about “psychopathic traits” is a meme, not a peer-reviewed paper. And the PubMed article? It’s about workplace dynamics, not sexual violence. You can’t just slap “dark triad” on any bad behavior and call it science. This is the problem with modern discourse: everyone’s an expert, but no one checks facts.

If anything, the real issue is how easily people fall for manipulation. But blaming “charming predators”? That’s just code for “I don’t want to look at my own complicity.” True strength isn’t about repelling others—it’s about not needing to.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/7ddd089b6bb7b50cc22756c8982a2aa4c7b35f0bc842501448f70c11a573f564