I would argue that he is then controlled opposition, if you seriously have a problem with a literal satanic statue being errected in the capitol maybe you should question whether or not you are even christian or just a bible thumper ready to hand off the entire generation to a bunch of violent pedophiles

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well, I've been listening to and reading his work for a few years now, and I don't think he's controlled opposition. He has done more to expose how the CRT movement has (or is trying to) infect the church than most theologians. His fit was less ideological than it was tactical/strategic. He is more strongly opposed to ESG, DEI, and the LGBTQ agenda than some popular "conservative Christians" I know, too. It's not that he's OK with statues to Satan (he definitely isn't--listen to the last few of his podcasts) it's that the left is baiting Christians into violence and that's exactly what they want us to do. They're trying to build a narrative that Christians *in general* are violent, "domestic terrorists" and we must be surveilled and curtailed. We don't want that. We must object to Satanic sculptures, obviously, but as peaceful pilgrims using legal avenues--not as new crusaders. Does that make sense?

Shorter: he's saying fight back but don't take the bait. They *want* a violent "drag Floyd" event they can plaster all over the news and use to support their "Christians are domestic terrorists" narrative. Our weapon is truth, not the sword.

if they want that bad enough they will simply stage it themselves...

then what?

They probably have and will, yes. Use legal means, but also trust in Providence, be comfortable with self-defense, etc. Natural Law trumps positive law wherever they conflict.

...let the reader understand.