Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Vitor Pamplona

Many of my friends have been preferring to own an S&P index and rent as opposed to owning a house. I find myself in that understanding as well.

Flimsy US Houses depreciate too much, too fast, and require too much regulatory upkeep (taxes, licenses, reviews, approvals to modify, insurance, not as liquid, etc) to be worth the hassle.

If this is true for the rest of the US, my main concern is decentralization. It doesn't make much sense to have the entire population owning your most valuable 500 companies as their main asset. It's a lot easier to shape/control 500 companies than millions of houses.

But maybe I am overthinking this. Is this a valid concern?

Avatar
Ben's BTC stories 1y ago

Sounds like betting on the horse that is not going to win the race. Unless you need a place to live, there is only one place to store value, and that's with Bitcoin.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.