test #[0]

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't have this event that #[2] is replying to

I have it, but my reply parsing wasn't able to reproduce the thread. the original event can be found:

https://nostr.io/e/524fc48163415f00c375b55bc2b0b9fe33a9b1256031f762c657881e99e25a70

It's because #[4]'s client doesn't put in the root thread id when replying so damus can't fetch the full thread. This is nip10.

If you long press on that event and click broadcast, I could see if it's a nip10 issue

oh derp I shouldn't assume people are using damus, but yeah if anyone could broadcast that event to damus or wellorder relay that would be handy :)

Well that explains it. It's a reply to a like. Lol?

#[4] you replied to a like! this is confusing but perhaps I could render something in this case lol

I like to think of myself as a bit of an edge case expert. 😉

this will be an interesting social norm to see established in nostr, how to handle ambiguous cases or even violations. some clients will be better suited to make best effort attempts to display strange stuff.

I definitely want damus to display at least something. Replies to nothing is just confusing. I think I just need to remove the kind filter in threads and then have a generic view for notes it doesn't recognize.

Can a reply to a "like" be treated as a reply to the message that was liked (at least in terms of how it's displayed in a UI)?

I think replying to likes or even retweeting likes might be fun