Replying to Avatar Mike Dilger ☑️

But domains don't have nostr keys to sign with. The relays part could be signed,yes, but the prevailing opinion was that we don't want to rely on DNS and would rather have such information elsewhere.
95
Blockchain Fairy 2y ago

um the user would sign the thing stored at the domain? aka just another event

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
rabble 2y ago

Yes, that’s what #[5] did with his NIP-65 spec for a signed message with relays, but there’s nothing yet about putting that signed message on the nip-05 verification / identity server or in a DHT where you could look it up without knowing at least one relay for that npub.

95
Blockchain Fairy 2y ago

#[8] 's standard i think now is you implement then nip

so we need dht on relays and maybe clients?

i start to think we could host more on the nip5 providers, maybe relays should start doing both, then hash chains and repos and nostr is feeling more like bluesky

the nostr way seems to be explore many possibilities and come to what works, i cant disagree with the progress this way