Politicians don't control the bankers, and the regulators do as they please since they are not elected by the public, they are appointed. I'm not sure that voting can fix this. They are either vocally in support of Bitcoin, or they are against it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The bankers controll the politicians

We can vote for people that wont allow CBDC.

THAT ARE PRO BITCOIN

TODAY WE HAVE A CHOICE.

Bankers are pro money though, they aren't pro-Bitcoin. CBDCs will effectively give the bankers more control over the system and ETFs just provide them with a means to manipulate the market harder.

The overwhelming majority of politicians are too stupid, old or corrupt to do the right thing, which is why the US is in the position it is in today.

I'm not against 'trying', but it seems like a futile effort to me.

We have already voted with our pockets.

Its time to vote for people that understand #bitcoin.

That are pro bitcoin.

That own bitcoin.

That will protect bitcoin.

#btc

Voting with your pockets is the #1 way to get their attention. That's why I don't watch or pay for TV or streaming services, I don't buy their products, use their services, eat their food, take their injections, or keep my money in their banks.

This, at least to me, seems far more effective than voting, or voting alone. Without participating in their systems, they would simply cease to exist.

Let’s left side of the curve this: would you rather at least try to make things better? Or just go full nihilist and do nothing because it might not work? I’d rather put in the literally 10 minutes it takes to vote and at least try. It’s free for god sake. It’s not like you have to travel to the moon and spend a ton of money. There’s no downside. Even just write in “F you” and force them tabulate that.