Nostr Web Client

"Humanity has an inherent addiction to what they want and not what they need."

Yes, but that is sexual selection. Women won't reproduce with men who don't make the cut. They'd rather stay childless. Which leads to the next generation of men being more-likely to make the cut.

We're just taking notice of this dynamic now because the environment has changed so dramatically, that about a quarter to a third of men won't make the next cut. That's brutal. Evolutionary pressure on par with the Bubonic Plague.

🇮🇹 Ṭø§Č̣āṄɛĻĻø 🇮🇹 1y ago

Most women actually also dont make the cut.

They have absolute zero evolutionary prowess because they were mostly too busy trying to show men that they can be men too.

They are further down the line, closer to the checkered flag of being evolutionarily obsolete than most men because of it.

And let's face it, whoever (male or female) owered themselves to being a labrat not 2 years ago, and now has developed the attention span of a fruitfly while they seemingly live like a potato bug (can't hear or see shit) have already failed natural selection. They are now dependents. Leeches on a cyst and angry at people like me for rupturing that cyst because the FIAT poison within it is not their lifeblood.

The truth hurts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Laeserin 1y ago

Most men and most women are not childless. That's "the cut".

Men are significantly more likely to be childless than women, in most countries.

Gary ₿usey 1y ago

Is this more the case in first, second, or third world countries?

Laeserin 1y ago

Which nations are leading has changed over time, tho.

Gary ₿usey 1y ago

"Men are significantly more likely to be childless than women, in most countries."

I was just referring to this part.

Laeserin 1y ago

Hmm... I don't know.

I assume that a welfare state geared towards women perhaps increases male childlessness, as it functions as an ersatz-husband, but I've got no source.

Low Information Voter 1y ago

Reduces the fitness costs of both hypergamy and promiscuity.

Hmmm.

Could go either way, prima facie. Does anyone have trend data handy?

Gary ₿usey 1y ago

"Does anyone have trend data handy?"

Lol. I gotta go. I have a busy day. I'll check back in later. 😎👍 nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl You're up! 🤣😅

Low Information Voter 1y ago

(Yawn) I gotta sleep here. GN plebs, let's do these convos more often!

Gary ₿usey 1y ago

GN. 💤

Laeserin 1y ago

GN

Low Information Voter 1y ago

1.4 reproducing women for every reproducing man, averaging over hundreds of generations in Europe and West Africa. But only 1.1 in East Asia, and middling numbers in West Asia and East Africa. I'll chase up the paper if anyone wants it.

No, I have no idea why the regional differences. Culture, and marriage customs, but in what ways...?

Laeserin 1y ago

I suspect more variance in the partners in more difficult environments, perhaps? Europe and West Africa have been particularly difficult places.

Low Information Voter 1y ago

Very possible.

But the effect is in an unexpected direction - more monopolising of mating opportunities by high-status males, at least in the form of high remarriage rates.

Laeserin 1y ago

Yes, that's what I meant.

In the West, at least, men are more likely to remarry after divorce, which would increase the number of men with children from more than one woman.

Western women are also probably more likely to have children from more than one man.

🇮🇹 Ṭø§Č̣āṄɛĻĻø 🇮🇹 1y ago

Yeah, no shit

Because they can't give birth.