When are we going to stop calling these "gifts," "loans," "personal financial arrangements," and call them what they are.
They're bribes.
Clarence Thomas’s $267,230 R.V. and the Friend Who Financed It https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/05/us/clarence-thomas-rv-anthony-welters.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Clarance Thomas' opinions are very predictable. I could predict every one of them. What good, then, would any bribe be? It makes no difference to his opinions.
Also, it cannot be a bribe if the person buying him things has no case in front of the supreme court.
Clarance just has some rich friends. I'm sorry that the author doesn't.
