Are we on a path for BIP444 to activate on Bitcoin?
Using consensus rules to fight spam seems misguided to me. If people want to combat mempool spam, that should be done through policy, and node operators should have access to as many policy tools as necessary. Stripping away policy options feels needlessly confrontational, especially when it is done in the name of enforcing a homogeneous mempool across all nodes.
Why not simply let node operators decide their own policies and defuse this whole situation? Is aiming for mempool uniformity really worth risking a contentious fork?
nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhs3mlty2 nostr:nprofile1qqsve2jcud7fnjzmchn4gq52wx9agey9uhfukv69dy0v4wpuw4w53nqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7ysp3f3 nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsu0ur8h
This whole debate only escalates when people try to solve a policy-layer disagreement with protocol-layer changes.
Once we pull subjective judgments like "spam" into consensus, we invite political influence and increase the chance of a split.
BIP444 is an attack on Bitcoin.
BIP444 and RTDS is fucking with peoples money.
