Replying to Avatar hh

I mentioned this in passing a couple of times, so I'd like to make it explicit:

I will use Nostr as long as:

1. no "moderation" happens at any level other than the client giving options and filters to the user so they can self-moderate their TL

2. no algorithm is implemented at any level to "enhance the user's experience", i.e., user analytics

It's these two simple rules, really.

When any of them is broken in a way that leaves me without recourse (for instance, if there are no more easily available censorship-free relays and non-spying clients), I will simply stop using Nostr.

Nostr is not a living necessity. It's completely superfluous and anyone can just drop it and live a happy, problem-free life. Better keep that in mind, devs.

Avatar
Jeff 2y ago

Couldn’t agree more

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
hh 2y ago

I believe Nostr has an uninmaginable potential as a protocol, really. It'd be such as waste if people insisted on applying the same rotten models to it.

Thread collapsed