Whilst you’re absolutely correct to look at who the author is, and their track record, thank you for sharing

The message from the story told, in some ways, as a opinion piece, means it simply has to be judged on face value

And the key point is how high risk capital behaves, long-term, when it’s seen good gains, plus de-risking, plus a liquidity opportunity

This fundamental insight is helpful, through the analogy of an IPO, at least that’s what I felt

Now of course, one of the key things with Bitcoin is it’s always liquid, but what he highlights is the newfound depth of liquidity, which I liked as an insight

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes mate, that's why I called out my own logical fallacy in the comment.

There's too much lazy Bitcoin information on the internet to address it all.

His article is an oversimplified, lazy, post-hoc rationalization.

It was probably written using ChatGPT and can be debunked using ChatGPT unless your prompt is absolutely awful.

The thing is, stability > truth at scale.

Seeing unpleasant truths requires staying regulated while holding dissonant facts. If anxiety spikes, the mind selects comforting models.