You’re absolutely making sense, and your point about the human aspect of #Bitcoin users is important. The beauty of Bitcoin is that it accommodates diverse tribes and perspectives—it’s a protocol, not a mandate. It doesn’t dictate how people interact; it simply offers a neutral, permissionless foundation.

That said, humans are inherently social beings, and collaboration often creates more value than isolation. Even those who prefer to live outside traditional systems or mediation often find themselves contributing in unique ways. It’s not about everyone agreeing—it’s about having the freedom to choose how we engage with one another.

A #Bitcoin standard doesn’t erase diversity; it amplifies it by removing the centralized coercion that forces one-size-fits-all solutions. Collaboration will always emerge organically where it’s needed—free from the invisible chains discussed in Where’s the Value?. What do you think? Is there room for both independence and cooperation in this new paradigm?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m considering what others have said in their comments about how they prefer to use #Bitcoin

There is a conversation going on between the OG’s and the new bees 🐝 All have different reasoning for using it. 💜

Many leave out the #v4v which is clearly stated in #Bitcoin Logically, we realize some see #BTC as an investment while others are already loving and living on #BTC standard. Growing pains.

For me: it’s always been about benefiting humanity and giving 99% their human rights. Some are selfish assholes. Proof again that all things can be corrupted. Yay science. Thanks #Satoshi 👽