Yep, they can just add a new law saying that it is illegal to hold Bitcoin in any form in a similar way they did with Gold in the 30s where no private household, bank, or business was allowed to own or hold more than a trivial amount of gold.
Sure they reversed that, but most of the gold is still in the gov's control.
That only affects citizens in the US. Would have immediate consequences globally that would not be good for the US gov.
They could do what you describe but I think we have passed that stage of that being palatable. Far to many elites have bitcoin.
Nah.. All they need is a scapegoat event to change public opinion about it. Iraq-war style. I am sure it will happen and I hope people will stand their ground and not be fooled by the conspiracy.
key legal terms in this discussion are:
U.S.
U.S. citizen
There is more than one legal definition for each of those terms... without defining terms when speaking of law, you might just as well be jacking off rather than flooding the already buried mind of man with more confusion posts.
95% of Americans are NOT U.S. citizens as the government chooses to class them once they(not knowing Law) check the box on the toilet paper.
It was the same with the folks who 6102'd themselves. The "order"(lol this is America not England, nigga) was directed at the "U.S. citizen" that the federal government has juridiction over - those would be people born in DC, or the territories and possessions. These people HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. They have pseudo clones of the real God-given rights which are enforced and GIVEN to them by Congress. They can also be taken away by Congress. Such are Statutory US citizens SUBJECT to the statutory codes and everchanging legal whims of the de facto corporate occupying government.
The OTHER US citizen is all of those folks born in the 50 states of the Republic. That man is a Constitutional US citizen and has certain inalienable God-given rights (not declared by the 14th Amendment, but innate, inherent, a priori, and INALIENABLE (cannot be traded away) - LIFE/PROPERTY being the foundational one, and the federal government has ZERO jurisdiction over this fella insofar that he is not domiciled (sometimes residence is also confusedly lumped in here while in reality they have distinct legal meanings and consequences relative to LEGAL STATUS, and thus STANDING in court) in a federal territory, possession or zone... the federal government has no more supernatural right to steal this mans property than you have a right to steal your neighbors... nation of LAWS, not men.
95%-plus of the people who "volunteered" their gold were NOT required to - just like with that other "voluntary" thingy - but, they were ignorant of the law.
get on the freedom train here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NvUvxaJ4ZEOV
#law #liberty #civics
