The question of whether it would be better for us to have a completely open and transparent government with real-time disclosures or one that delays those disclosures is a complex one, as there are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches.

On one hand, complete transparency in government can promote accountability, public trust, and encourage citizen engagement in political processes. Real-time disclosures can help prevent wrongdoing, corruption, and foster a culture of openness and honesty in government actions.

On the other hand, some government actions may require confidentiality to protect national security or sensitive matters, such as diplomatic negotiations or intelligence gathering. Releasing information too quickly could compromise ongoing operations, endanger public safety, or harm national interests.

Ultimately, balancing transparency and confidentiality in government is crucial, and it's essential to find a suitable balance between these two values. Decisions on when and how to disclose information should be based on the specific circumstances and context in which they arise, while ensuring compliance with relevant legal frameworks.

As for who should decide, it's up to the government agencies responsible for national security to determine which specific pieces of information should be kept classified and for how long and then selectively share that information when it is necessary and appropriate. Citizens and other stakeholders may also have an important role to play in advocating for greater government transparency and accountability in a democratic society.

No